Shit Happens—So Don’t Ban Plastic Bags

It’s all the rage: Let’s ban plastic bags once and for all, for the environment. Several local news outlets began reporting last week on a new online petition pushing for such a ban. The petition, begun by Green Philly Blog, was even signed by City Councilman Jim Kenney, who back in 2009 unsuccessfully co-sponsored a citywide plastic-bag ban himself—originally just a fee, actually, but that was deemed anti-poor.

On its face, sure, this is a good idea. After all, throughout the country, plastic bags create 300,000 tons of landfill waste annually, according to the NRDC and cited by Green Philly Blog in the article that accompanies the currently 402 signatures for a ban. The average U.S. family uses 1,500 plastic bags per year. That’s a lot of petroleum-based waste.

Bans have gone into effect all over the country. The biggest city to ban bags is Los Angeles. Seattle’s ban was made official on July 1, 2012. A similar ban exists in Portland, Oregon. And Pennsylvania State Sen. Daylin Leach unsuccessfully attempted a statewide fee here a last year.

And as with most pressing issues of the day, there are vehement arguments on both sides of this debate. The plastics industry, obviously, hates this and successfully lobbied against the Philly tax/ban proposal in 2009. Among some of the statistics they no doubt deployed to get 10 councilmembers on board: Plastic bags make up less than one percent of space in landfills. Some cities that have banned plastic bags have additionally instituted small fees on paper bags—but doesn’t taxing any sort of bag create a burden on the poor? Additionally, many studies show that the paper alternative may actually be worse for the environment. Producing paper bags takes more water and energy, and more space in trucks to transport. Once discarded, paper bags take up more space in landfills than plastic bags. (Not to mention that a ban on a single recyclable product sort of overlooks the very real long-term solution of recycling. And considering the implications of the single-product ban, please note it takes more energy to recycle paper than plastic.)

Those reusable bags? Often made in China and shipped here using cheap, dirty fuel. Studies show only 10 percent of customers remember to take their reusable stores to the store on a regular basis, even in places where plastic bags have been banned. Then they biodegrade slower than plastic bags—and are piling up as more companies trendily hand them out with your clothing order.

But my additional, personal problem with a plastic-bag ban is really, really specific: Someone needs to clean up all the dog shit. And if I know people—and I do know some—they’re not going to travel through hell and high water, a.k.a. Manayunk, to buy plastic bags for poop-scooping if they don’t have free ones laying around. That means more shit all over the streets.

I’m not just worried about stepping in it. I’m worried about drinking it.

According to the Philadelphia Water Department, dog waste in yards and parks is a source of storm-water runoff pollution. Why? Because we live in the goddamn Delaware River Watershed. According to 2004 statistics compiled by Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People News, there were 325,271 dogs living throughout the city of Philadelphia. Philly produces about 90 tons of dog poop per year, according to Joanne Dahme of the Philadelphia Water Department. Nationwide, 40 percent of all households own dogs, who produce 3.6 billion pounds of waste each year, equaling—and I’m only telling you this because I love you—800 football fields of animal poop, stacked a foot high. The average dog takes a dump 20 times a week, which means 20 plastic bags a week.

Okay, so what? Well, just as it does on land, animal waste acts as a fertilizer in the water, meaning it promotes plant growth—which can choke waterways, increase algae blooms and rob the water of oxygen, according to phillywatersheds.org. Not to mention that the bacteria that grows in poop can cause disease. Dog waste can additionally contain Toxocariasis, a roundworm that can be transmitted from dogs to humans which causes vision loss, fever, and a cough, among other terrible side effects. The PWD has actually enacted programs over the last few years to combat dog waste’s impact on our water supply—and help spread the word to those who don’t know any better.

But if we ban plastic bags, it sort of won’t matter if we know any better or not. Some people, currently on the verge of caring, will stop. I live in a relatively clean neighborhood, and there’s still dog shit all over the place. Buying separate bags just for dogs? Some people might do that—but I don’t need a study to tell me that some people won’t.

6 Responses to “ Shit Happens—So Don’t Ban Plastic Bags ”

  1. Jeremiah Wright says:

    the greens can keep their reusable germ spreading bags, thank you very much.

  2. Chris says:

    I don’t remember seeing anyone else raising this point. Way to think outside the box!

  3. Melissa says:

    I truly see both sides of this argument and as a cashier at a CVS I know how many plastic bags we go through on a regular basis. My beef isn’t with plastic bags in general, they are a necessary evil and I understand that. What drives me bonkers is when customers find the need to have things with handles in bags or worse double bagged. Examples being milk gallons, their TIDE, a bag of chips when it is the only thing they are buying. You do NOT need a bad for these items and it just creates waste. Most people do not recycle their plastic bags either, if they did it would not be such a big deal. But people are lazy and just throw them away. When people are buying multiple items they need a bag obviously, but when people buy a HALLMARK car and ask for it in a plastic bag they are just being ridiculous. If everyone just thought twice about a bag when it came to their purchases maybe this would not be such a big issue as it is. According to Jeremiah Wright I am a “green” with my reusable bags (which by the way, I wash thank you very much) but I am walking around forcing people to be active in saving the environment, I know people don’t care and, yes it breaks my heart but I am not going to force feed information to people who don’t want to hear it. On the issue of the dog poop, you can always pick it up in something other than plastic bags like old newspaper. There is always a solution if people are just willing to look for it.

  4. Joe says:

    I wonder what people with about carrying things before we invented plastic bags. I bet they existed just fine.

  5. Dawn G/ says:

    You can get puppy poop bags made out of corn starch or something in all the major Pet stores…
    http://www.petco.com/product/119141/Arm-And-Hammer-Essentials-Biodegradable-Refill-Waste-Bags-for-the-Essentials-Dispenser.aspx?CoreCat=OnSiteSearch

    So, there’s your answer. The best way to deal with dog poop is (in reality) flushing it down the toilet, but I don’t know ANYONE who does that.

  6. Joe says:

    So we will hand out billions of free plastic bags every year so that dog owners don’t have to purchase poop bags? That is the most economically and ecologically silly argument I have ever heard.

    Other idiotic arguments:
    - bags are only 1% of landfill space – a good excuse for doing nothing; can you name anything else that makes up more than 1% and is this easy to address??

    - paper bag fees hurt the poor – I constantly hear from businesses that additional burdens (i.e., regulation) increase prices for the consumer. If businesses no longer need to pay for the bags, doesn’t that mean that they will lower prices? Reusable bags cost $1 each and last forever. This isn’t going to hurt 99.999% of Americans.

    - paper bags take up more trunk space – I am not sure how large your trunk is, but I can fit five bags in my trunk fine.

    - bans thwart recycling efforts – since when is it better to recycle than reduce? Reduce, reuse, recycle . . . in that order. BTW, plastic bag recycling has failed to climb above 5% despite years of promotion.

    - only 10% of customers take reusable bags – This is because you haven’t banned bags. In CA and DC, it is closer to 80%

    - reusable bags biodegrade more slowly than plastic bags – Reusable bags don’t get thrown out, so this is irrelevant. Besides, plastic bags require 500 years to biodegrade – not a good option.

    - Chinese bags are shipped with dirty fuel – Is the fuel any dirtier than the fuel used to ship American bags? A reusable bag is shipped once. Plastic bags are currently shipped 500x as often.

    Inane.

Leave a Reply

Follow PW

Got a news tip?

If you see something interesting, odd, funny or, of course, illegal, let us know by emailing tips@philadelphiaweekly.com