Aug11 |
Why Philly needs gay marriageI’ve been surprised, since moving to Philly, that a lot of the pro-gay-marriage activism in this city has been focused almost entirely on California and Proposition 8. Maybe I’m missing stuff – I don’t hob-nob with Philly’s gay activists – but that’s kind of weird to me. Philly’s relatively gay-friendly, from what I can tell, but there aren’t marriage rights here. So why no fuss? I thought about this again last night, reading a piece in National Journal about a gay couple from Ohio. One of the partners got sick while on a trip to Philly, and it got complicated.
And that’s what the fight for marriage is about: Not simply the right to love each other — no law can force or prohibit that — but the right to care for each other. My relatively open-minded conservative friends say they don’t have a problem with gay couples loving and caring for each other. They just don’t want to give up “marriage” as being exclusively a straight institution. But that’s a have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too conflict I can’t reconcile. Sure, some states allow gay couples the legal right to care for each other through civil unions. But a lot of states don’t go that far. And so gay couples are forced to deal with indignities and obstacles that heterosexual couples don’t experience — and would never stand for, frankly. So Philly needs gay marriage. Pennsylvania needs gay marriage. Loving, committed couples need the right to care for each other. It’s that simple. |
|
|
|


It would be great for our economy too.