<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lurker? Guilty As Charged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/trouble/2008/07/24/lurker-guilty-as-charged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/trouble/2008/07/24/lurker-guilty-as-charged/</link>
	<description>A blog about mental health</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:55:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/trouble/2008/07/24/lurker-guilty-as-charged/comment-page-1/#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trouble.pwblogs.com/2008/07/24/lurker-guilty-as-charged/#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>Gee Liz, that kind of surprises me that you wouldn&#039;t confide. You seem very open about your illness and that is what keeps me coming back to this site. I have to say I&#039;m pretty much a lurker at the other web sites I visit but those are more news/political sites like Huffington and Crooks and Liars. I always seem to have something to say but dont see much point when I&#039;m going to be giving the 8,945th response. ANyway, after years of having a fear of revealing too much of anything about myself, I find it cathartic to just say, &quot;what the hell, here&#039;s my story&quot;. Ordinarily, I might hope for a response from you but I think it&#039;s possible you&#039;re lurking around your own web site. Anyway, being in the company of people who might understand you even a little is a good thing even if you remain lurking in the shadows. Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Liz, that kind of surprises me that you wouldn&#8217;t confide. You seem very open about your illness and that is what keeps me coming back to this site. I have to say I&#8217;m pretty much a lurker at the other web sites I visit but those are more news/political sites like Huffington and Crooks and Liars. I always seem to have something to say but dont see much point when I&#8217;m going to be giving the 8,945th response. ANyway, after years of having a fear of revealing too much of anything about myself, I find it cathartic to just say, &#8220;what the hell, here&#8217;s my story&#8221;. Ordinarily, I might hope for a response from you but I think it&#8217;s possible you&#8217;re lurking around your own web site. Anyway, being in the company of people who might understand you even a little is a good thing even if you remain lurking in the shadows. Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormgazer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/trouble/2008/07/24/lurker-guilty-as-charged/comment-page-1/#comment-3418</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormgazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trouble.pwblogs.com/2008/07/24/lurker-guilty-as-charged/#comment-3418</guid>
		<description>So, if I understand this correctly, non-social types gain the same benefits from support groups as the social types, minus the benefits to be had by actual socialization?

Am I the only one who sees this as a no-brainer? It&#039;s like doing a study to determine that people who don&#039;t socialize at parties still get to hear all the music and eat tortilla chips, and can have just as good a time as the social types if they&#039;re left alone. I just don&#039;t see the purpose of this study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if I understand this correctly, non-social types gain the same benefits from support groups as the social types, minus the benefits to be had by actual socialization?</p>
<p>Am I the only one who sees this as a no-brainer? It&#8217;s like doing a study to determine that people who don&#8217;t socialize at parties still get to hear all the music and eat tortilla chips, and can have just as good a time as the social types if they&#8217;re left alone. I just don&#8217;t see the purpose of this study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>